- Join Date
- Jun 2013
Confusion about Mysterium: Card Counting 101
This article, "Mysterium: Card Counting 101," written by Jason England, talks, mainly, as examples, about 2 different card-counting techniques, the Hi-Lo count and the K-O count.
In the article it states that the Hi-Lo count is a balanced count.
"If youíll recall, the Hi-Lo had the same number of high cards as it did low cards. The Hi-Lo is an example of a balanced count," (Quoted from the article).
The article states the K-O count is an unbalanced count.
"First of all, the K-O is not a balanced count. There are now 24 low cards, 8 medium cards, and only 20 high cards," (Quoted from the article).
However, in the fourth paragraph from the bottom of the article, Jason says,
"Although I didnít mention it earlier, the Hi-Lo (and other unbalanced counts) needs an adjustment before it can be used at a real table,".
Is this a typo or am I missing something? If it is a typo, did he mistakenly put the Hi-Lo count instead of the K-O count, or did he mean to say "other balanced counts" instead of "other unbalanced counts"?
The article can be found here: http://www.theory11.com/news/mysteri...-counting-101/
Good catch. Yes, that should have read "...the Hi Lo (and other balanced counts) needs an adjustment before it can be used at a real table."
The truth is, you can bet off of the running count without converting it to a true count for balanced systems like the Hi Lo, but you lose a lot of information fidelity that way.
Likewise, you can use a true count conversion on a count that doesn't need one (like the KO), but your increase in EV is minimal, so most players don't bother.
I didn't mention this in the article because it's advanced information and more interesting to theorists than real players. Regardless, the original text is in error and you caught it.